Skip to main content

Climate Feedback Loops

·4 mins

If you pay much attention to the mainstream media, you’ve likely heard the phrase “energy transition” thrown around, which alludes to an ongoing global effort to transition away from fossil fuels and move toward so-called “green” energy sources1. But if you look at the data, fossil fuels are still doing most of the work2.

The Kyoto protocol was adopted in 1997, and as the graph below shows, atmospheric CO2 has kept climbing.

CO2 since Kyoto
CO2 levels since 1997, the year the Kyoto protocol was adopted

Subsequent climate treaties have similarly struggled to bend the curve of emissions. While corporate sustainability reports highlight various initiatives, the hard data shows that global fossil fuel extraction continues to increase annually, with pollution accelerating along an exponential curve.

Electric vehicles are a good example of the tension here. While their efficiency is impressive—converting about 60% of electrical energy to power at the wheels compared to 20% for internal combustion engines—their overall impact on emissions has been limited because the energy used to manufacture and charge them often comes from fossil fuel sources. They help more in places with cleaner grids, but they don’t change much if the electricity and supply chain are still dirty.

Looking ahead, we might envision reaching a critical mass where renewable energy capacity begins to meaningfully displace fossil fuels. However, this optimistic scenario faces a significant economic challenge known as Jevons paradox: as alternative energy sources reduce overall energy costs, demand tends to increase in response, potentially offsetting efficiency gains.

Feedback Loops #

Climate feedback loops can push warming further or hold some of it back. What matters is that a lot of the ones we’re watching now seem more likely to speed things up than slow them down3.

Climate change feedback loops
Climate change feedback loops

One particularly interesting feedback loop that receives less attention is what we might call the human-induced carbon climate feedback loop. As climate change progresses, humans require more energy for cooling in hotter regions and adapting to changing conditions. Without proper carbon pricing mechanisms, the most economically attractive option to meet this growing energy demand often remains fossil fuels, creating a self-reinforcing cycle.

Human feedback
Human-induced climate feedback loop

Breaking this cycle would require effective carbon pricing—essentially assigning the true cost of carbon emissions to those who produce them. The hesitation to implement robust carbon taxes stems from legitimate economic concerns, as such policies would likely slow short-term economic growth. However, the potential long-term economic benefits of averting severe climate impacts could far outweigh these costs.

Beyond 1.5°C #

The goal of limiting warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, celebrated during the Paris Agreement, faces increasing challenges as we’ve already observed temperatures exceeding 2°C on some days4. This doesn’t mean all is lost, but it does require an honest reassessment of our climate objectives and adaptation strategies.

2°C achieved
Days exceeding 2°C above pre-industrial levels

A warming world of 2°C or beyond presents significant challenges for ecosystems and human societies alike. For a thought-provoking exploration of these possible futures, I recommend The Ministry for the Future, which offers both sobering scenarios and imaginative solutions.

Recent years have shown concerning temperature trends. In 2023-2024, we observed statistical anomalies reaching 6 sigma deviations from historical means5—essentially events so rare they shouldn’t occur in our lifetime by chance alone. Both sea surface6 and air temperatures7 have shown remarkable deviations, particularly in the North Atlantic. While El Niño has contributed to these spikes, these patterns align with predictions from climate models that incorporate feedback mechanisms.

Moving Forward #

None of this gets fixed by pretending the problem is smaller than it is. Individual and collective action both matter here:

  • Political engagement: Support candidates who advocate for meaningful climate policies, particularly carbon pricing mechanisms that correctly assign costs to emissions.

  • Technological innovation: Remarkable progress continues in renewable energy, battery storage, and carbon capture technologies, with costs falling dramatically over the past decade.

  • Community resilience: Many communities worldwide are developing innovative approaches to climate adaptation while improving quality of life through urban greening, walkable cities, and local food systems.

  • Business transformation: Companies increasingly recognize that sustainability represents both a moral imperative and a business opportunity, with significant investment flowing toward climate solutions.

We’re still choosing which feedback loops to strengthen. Right now we’re funding the bad ones.


  1. There’s much debate about how green green energy is. As it currently stands, a great deal of pollution is generated by the extraction of raw materials, production, transportation, and installation of wind, solar, and nuclear power sources. Theoretically, solar and wind could eventually meet the base load requirements, but there’s no evidence in the data we have that this is happening at any significant scale. ↩︎

  2. https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix ↩︎

  3. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20220726_Feedbacks_affecting_global_warming_and_climate_change_-_block_diagram.svg ↩︎

  4. https://climate.copernicus.eu/global-temperature-exceeds-2degc-above-pre-industrial-average-17-november ↩︎

  5. https://twitter.com/EliotJacobson/status/1721560657831895437 ↩︎

  6. https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/ ↩︎

  7. https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/t2_daily/?dm_id=world ↩︎